Evidence for various flood events may possibly be related to a single, more extensive event. Does some of the evidence listed below point to contemporaneous events? A great flood, such as the one mentioned in the Bible, would leave its marks in different parts of the world. If there was crustal upheaval in one part of the world, surely it would be accompanied by crustal movements elsewhere. A widespread catastrophic event would help to explain various extinctions of large animals, that otherwise seem enigmatic.
The evidence for catastrophic floods includes oversized valleys, canyons, remnant mesas and bluffs that show the erosive work of great volumes of water in the past, streamlined landforms, giant current ripples and bars, lag deposits, raised, non-horizontal ancient shorelines, lake basins, and similar features. The title of this page refers to a 'dynamic' database because contributions submitted by others are welcome; the resource is expected to expand over time.
Vertical crustal movements seem to be one of the most obvious ways in which floods having geologic significance can be caused. But uplift or subsidence over wide areas implies crustal instability elsewhere. If land rose up in one place, it must have subsided somewhere else, or else we would end up with a hole inside the earth. So, much of the flood evidence points to a more general and extensive flood.
Extinctions also point to a widespread flood; there is no way glaciers or ice sheets could accomplish it, and local floods would not cause extinctions, however violent they are supposed to have been.
It is a curious fact, although the great flood is a feature of many traditions, none make mention of any ice age.
The Nature of the Flood - lists some of the flood models that have been proposed.
Legends of the Deluge
© 1999 by Douglas E. Cox
The Creation Concept