Time to Re-examine our Assumptions about Cross Strata?
The idea of a sedimentary origin for all patterns of cross strata needs
to be carefully evaluated. This is an old geologic tradition that is
seldom questioned. Some of the early writers on geology based
their ideas about cross strata on superficial observations. Here are
some reasons why assumptions about a
sedimentary origin for all forms of cross strata (which early writers
sometimes
referred to as 'false strata')
may not have a rock solid foundation.
- Cross strata in quartz sandstones and in the drift typically
exhibits smooth curves even when boulders
are present. In most of the sandy gravel of the drift this is
characteristic. It is also true of many ancient conglomerates, with a
sandy
matrix, and rounded pebbles, where cross strata is present. If the
patterns of cross strata
were due to a sedimentary process involving fast currents, the patterns
would not be
smooth if boulders were present because of turbulence. This is a simple
fact of
elementary physics. Why no turbulence effects, such as current shadows
or tails
of sediment accumulation on the lee side of pebbles or boulders, if
fast currents
were involved when the patterns were formed and the boulders and
pebbles were deposited?
- The smooth, distinct laminations of many types of cross strata
discredit a sedimentary
origin, as in the sedimentary process where particles of varying size
are deposited there is turbulence due to roughness of the bed, that
results in very indistinct laminations. The patterns of cross strata
formed by currents in rivers are usually
irregular and not smooth like those seen in ancient sandstones or in
the sands and gravels of the drift.
- Large scale cross strata is common in sandstones. The patterns
are usually smooth, concave-upward arcs.
- Preservation of patterns of cross strata even in granite and
hi-grade
metamorphic rocks is enigmatic for a sedimentary interpretation. The
preservation of distinct patterns of cross strata is most unlikely if
it has a primary
sedimentary origin, due to the compression, shearing, and distortion
associated with metamorphic conditions of burial. Yet the patterns of
cross strata in such rocks may appear fresh, and
undisturbed. Examples occur in the Lorrain Formation in Ontario, and
can be observed at roadcuts along the Trans Canada Highway north of
Lake Huron.
- The sedimentary process itself indicates that the distinct,
smooth patterns of cross
strata are unlikely to be sedimentary. A discussion
of the physics involved in sedimentation is accompanied by this movie
showing details of the process of sedimentation in a flume, and a
second movie
illustrating the spreading of a bedload sheet. Patterns of cross strata
resembling those of sandstones in nature are not formed in flume
experiments. The above movies help to show why. It is evident that the
processes illustrated do not form well defined, smooth laminations like
that seen in cross stratified sandstones. The formation of layers of
sandy sediment in a stream is one of progressive spreading of the layer
of sediment, which randomly deposits particles at its edge. There may
be some grading by particle size in these sedimentary laminations. In
natural
cross strata, typical of sandstones, the laminations were caused by a
different process, involving crystallization in successive layers. The
cross-laminations were determined by the progressive nature of the
crystallization front that passed through the rock. This was a
pressure-related alteration.
- Cross-strata, like that seen in ancient sandstones, is not
forming in nature today.
- The chemical purity of many rocks which exhibit cross strata does
not support the assumption of a sedimentary environment of formation.
Sandstones may be 99% pure quartz; mineralogic evidence of these
sandstones points to a long
history of diagenesis in their development, involving chemical
dissolution and replacement of foreign minerals, and processes that
would likely
remove traces of original sedimentary stratification. Yet many of these
rocks exhibit distinct patterns of cross strata.
- Formations that exhibit cross strata may contain non-sedimentary
structures such as concretionary banding, balls or lenses containing
material with a different texture, either more coarse or finer than the
enclosing matrix, or vertical structures such as pipes or dikes. See Non-sedimentary
Structures in the Drift.
- Contacts between cross stratified sandstones and underlying rocks
typically exhibit sole marks formed by expansion effects as cross
stratified formations spread laterally due to increased volume and
porosity as they formed. Analogous marks on the bedrock below the drift
caused striations.
Copyright © 2006
by Douglas E. Cox
The Creation
Concept
| Controversy
About
the Glacial Theory