+ Larger Font | - Smaller Font
There are several parallels between Isaiah 60 and Revelation 21,
which are both prophecies about the holy city. Many of the hidden
references to Isaiah's prophecy in Revelation 21 are revealed by the
links to corresponding verses in the other chapter below.
Isaiah 60 |
Revelation 21 |
|
|
In the table below the corresponding verses and phrases in the two
chapters are compared.
Isaiah 60 |
Revelation 21 |
Isaiah 60:1 |
Revelation 21:3 |
Isaiah 60:2 |
Revelation 21:11 |
Isaiah 60:3 |
Revelation 21:24 |
Isaiah 60:5 |
Revelation 21:1 |
Isaiah 60:5, 7 |
Revelation 21:26 |
Isaiah 60:6 |
Revelation 21:21 |
Isaiah 60:11 |
Revelation 21:25 |
Isaiah 60:12 |
Revelation 21:8 |
Isaiah 60:14 |
Revelation 21:10 |
Isaiah 60:16 |
Revelation 21:6 |
Isaiah 60:18 |
Revelation 21:27 |
Isaiah 60:18 |
Revelation 21:24 |
Isaiah 60:18 |
Revelation 21:12, 21 |
Isaiah 60:19 |
Revelation 21:23 |
Isaiah 60:20 |
Revelation 21:25 |
Isaiah 60:20 |
Revelation 21:23 |
Isaiah 60:20 |
Revelation 21:4 |
Isaiah 60:21 |
Revelation 21:27 |
Below are some comments by scholars who noted some correspondence
Revelation 21 and Isaiah 60. R.A. Torrey wrote in Treasury of
Scriptural Knowledge, Note to Isa. 60:11:
http://www.studylight.org/com/tsk/view.cgi?book=isa&chapter=060
The subject of this chapter, says Bp. Lowth, is the great increase and flourishing state of the church of God, by the conversion and accession of the heathen nations to it; which is set forth in such ample and exalted terms, as plainly shew that the full completion of this prophecy is reserved for future times. This subject is displayed in the most splendid colors, under a great variety of images highly poetical, designed to give a general idea of the glories of that perfect state of the church of God, which we are taught to expect in the latter times; when the fulness of the Gentiles shall come in, and the Jews shall be converted and gathered from their dispersions, and "the kingdom of this world shall become the kingdom of our Lord and of His Christ." |
Frank Binford Hole (1874-1964) stated in his Isaiah commentary:
http://www.biblecentre.org/commentaries/index_ot.htm
In the latter part of Revelation
21, we have described the new and
heavenly Jerusalem, which is "the Lamb's wife"-a symbolic description;
of the church in its heavenly position during the millennial age, and
if we compare with it the details of our chapter concerning the earthly
Jerusalem, we notice certain similarities, and yet striking contrasts.
The presence of the Lord is the glory of both cities. The gates of both
are open continually to receive the wealth and honour of the nations.
Both have an abundance of "gold," and find their everlasting "light" in
the Lord. But the contrasts are more numerous. The gates of the earthly will not be shut day or night of the heavenly not shut by day -but the day is an eternal one, for there is no night there. The glory of the earthly will be the temple, described in verse 13 as "the place of My feet." Jehovah will have His feet On the earth; but in the heavenly there is no temple, for "the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it." It is the place of His presence rather than the place of His feet. The earthly will know a glory brighter than the sun; but the heavenly will have no need of the sun for the Lamb is the light thereof. Gold will be brought plentifully into the earthly; but in the heavenly it forms the street, and they walk on it. We think we may say that the difference is accounted for by the introduction, in Revelation, of THE LAMB. |
Jan Fekkes wrote in Isaiah
and prophetic traditions in the book of
Revelation, Continuum International Publishing
Group,
1994, p. 265:
http://books.google.ca/books?id=uEnXbRWbi0AC
In the final pericope of the New
Jerusalem vision (Rev. 21.22-22.5) John shifts from architectural
imagery to a picture of life in the city itself. The outward physical
description gives way to an inward view of the Holy City and its
citizens. With thic change of perspective comes a corresponding change
in biblical foundations. From the building oracle of Isaiah 54 which
dominated Rev. 21.18-21, John now turns to the Zion prophecy of Isaiah
60, with its emphasis on the relationship between the glorious future
Jerusalem and the nations. For one who is consciously building on New
Jerusalem prophecies, the transition from Isaiah 54 to Isaiah 60 is a
natural one. For since none of the prophecies in Isaiah 55-59 are
directed to Zion, these two chapters are thematically contiguous.
Although allusions to Isaiah 60 control this final section, John blends
in traditions from other New Jerusalem prophecies as well (Isa. 52;
Zech. 14; Ezek. 47). |
Gregory K. Beale wrote in The
book of Revelation: a commentary on
the Greek text, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1999, p.
1062:
http://books.google.ca/books?id=HjKUiljUwcUC
Some interpret 21:10-22:5 as a
literal description of an actual physical city. But this is highly
improbable since "the bride of the Lamb" (v 10), that is, the eternal
community of the redeemed (so 21:2, 10), is equated with the detailed
layout of the city in 21:11-22:5: "I will show you the bride, the wife
of the Lamb,... and he showed me the holy city, Jerusalem" (21:9-10). 21:9-22-5 is a recapitulation of the immediately preceeding section of 21:1-8 that amplifies the picture there of God's consummate communion with his people and their consummate safety in the new creation. For example, 21:2 is developed in 21:9-11; 21:3 in 21:22-24 and 22:3; 21:6 in 22:1; and 21:8 in 21:27a. Such use of parallelism and recapitualtion is typical in the Apocalypse and characteristic of Hebrew style. This is seen in Isaiah 60, which is repeatedly alluded to in Rev. 21:11-22:5 (e.g., cf. Isa. 60:1b with 60:2b and 19b; 60:4c with 60:9b; 60:5b with 60:11b; and 60:19 with 60:20). The reference to the "city" in Rev. 20:9 suggests that the city portrayed in 21:9-22:5 is revealed in hidden, partial form throughout the church age as a result of Christ's redemptive word. The segment here reveals the perfected form of the city. Some, however, see 21:9-22:5 as describing the millennium of 20:4-6. With this they see 21:1-8 as portraying the eternal state. In the light of the parallelisms just observed between 21:1-8 and 21:9-22:5, the burden of proof lies on those who do not see the latter recapitulating the former. Likewise, those who view the second section as a later addition or traditional fragment incorporated haphazardly need to adduce more evidence before the thesis can gain persuasiveness. |
David Mathewson wrote in Isaiah
in the New Testament, Steve Moyise,
M. J. J. Menken eds. Continuum International
Publishing Group, 2005. p. 206-209:
http://books.google.ca/books?id=yEKfTSCESyMC&pg=PA206
Following the detailed
description of the material make-up of the New Jerusalem, John turns to
a description of life within the city (vv. 22-37). This shift in focus
is accompanied by a corresponding shift in OT Vorbild. At this point texts from
Isaiah once again dominate. John draws upon Isaiah 60 for several aspects of his portrayal. Isaiah 60 envisions a time of eschatological restoration when God's glorious presence will suffuse the land and the people will be restored to their homeland. The two statements in Rev. 21:23, that 'the city does not have need of the sun or the moon to illuminate it' and 'for the glory of God will illuminate it', echo Isaiah's 'the sun shall no longer be your light by day, nor for brightness shall the moon give light to you by night' (Isa. 60:19a) and 'the Lord will be your everlasting light, and your God will be your glory' (Isa. 60:19b) respectively. This could be understood to mean only that the sun and moon are no longer necessary, not that they are obliterated. However, given the emphasis on the removal of the old order (20:11), along with the negation of elements from the previous creation that cease to exist in the new (21:4; 21:22), it is probable that John envisions their dissolution here. The allusion to Isaiah 60 functions as a further rationale for the missing temple in John's vision (21:22). The light of God's presence so infuses the entire city that a separate temple is rendered unnecessary. In 21:24 John picks up yet another significant theme from Isaiah 60: the pilgrimage of the nations to Jerusalem. John's statement that 'all the nations shall walk through to its light, and the kings of the earth shall bring their glory into it' appears to derive from Isa. 60:3's 'nations shall come to your light, and kings to the brightness of your dawn'. However, John's statement is probably a synthesis of a number of elements in Isaiah 60 related to the role of the nations in the eschatological restoration of Jerusalem. 60:3 nations are drawn to Jerusalem's light 60:5 wealth of the nations comes to the city 60:6 nations will come bringing gold and incense 60:10 kings shall come and minister 60:11 nations will bring their wealth and kings come in procession 60:16 Jerusalem sucks the milk of natioins and the breasts of kings Furthermore, as Bauckham has argued, John was probably also drawing on Isa. 2:2-5, another text which depicts an end-time pilgrimage of the nations to Jerusalem. Syntactically, John's *** can be accounted for by the *** of Isa. 2:5. The upshot of this is that the nations are not only drawn to the light as in Isaiah 60, but they live in it (Isa. 2:5). Although Beale thinks that John refers here to those who have been converted throughout the entire course of the church age, the semantic effect of alluding to pilgrimage texts from Isaiah is that the author evokes the expectation of an end-time conversion of the nations. Like his prophetic predecesor, for John the new Jerusalem is a centre of a universal pilgrimage of the nations to worship God. Those who previously worshipped the beast now render allegiance to God and the Lamb. Isaiah 60 continues to exert influence in Rev. 21:25-26, where John's new heaven and new earth (v. 22), suggest the appropriateness of reading Rev. 22:5 in the light of Isa. 66:21. |